Workflow

From reference maps to condition-consistent diagnostics

CMap transforms reference performance maps to actual operating conditions, enabling reliable comparison with field measurements.

CMap Workflow

From reference maps to condition-consistent diagnostics

CMap guides the analyst through a structured engineering workflow: configure the compressor, define the actual gas and inlet conditions, calculate the expected off-design maps and compare them with measured field performance.

CMap transformation workflow overview
Structured process

A clear engineering sequence

The workflow is designed to avoid inconsistent comparisons and to create the correct performance baseline before any diagnostic conclusion is made.

1

Configure the compressor reference

Start from OEM datasheet maps or shop performance test curves. CMap uses this reference information to build a compressor model that captures the characteristic behavior of the machine.

Reference compressor performance maps
2

Define gas and inlet conditions

Set the gas mixture composition, suction pressure and suction temperature for the operating case to be evaluated. These conditions may represent actual field operation or a future forecasted scenario.

Off-design compressor performance maps
3

Transform the performance maps

CMap applies thermodynamic modeling and compressor similarity principles to transform reference maps into expected maps at the selected operating conditions.

Performance map transformation concept
4

Compare measured and expected performance

Once the expected baseline is calculated at the same inlet conditions, field measurements can be compared objectively against predicted values.

Measured versus expected performance evaluation
5

Diagnose, report and decide

Deviations between measured and expected values support troubleshooting, efficiency assessment, maintenance planning, RCA and plant optimization decisions.

CMap reporting and diagnostic support
Transformation concept

Performance evaluation becomes reliable only after conditions are aligned.

Design or shop-test maps are transformed into the actual operating condition before field measurements are assessed. This is the core logic behind condition-consistent compressor diagnostics.

Outputs

What the workflow delivers

CMap converts operating data and reference maps into information that can be used for technical decisions.

Expected performance maps

Predicted curves calculated at the selected off-design inlet conditions.

Measured vs expected comparison

Quantitative comparison between field data and the correct predicted baseline.

Deviation analysis

Objective support for diagnostics, troubleshooting and maintenance strategy.

Key message

Measure is not enough. You must compare correctly.

CMap makes compressor performance evaluation consistent by ensuring that expected and measured values are referenced to the same operating conditions.

Ask CMap AI
CMap AI Assistant
Hi, I’m CMap AI Assistant. Ask me about the CMap workflow.